Tinker vs. Des Moines Summary (Download Included)


Tinker vs. Des Moines Main

If you’re looking for a brief (650ish words) summary on a topic in history you’re in the right place! You can find reading passages for U.S. History and World History topics and can download a PDF copy for yourself. If you need a digital copy there is a Google link provided as well.

This is an ongoing project, so stop back frequently and see what we’ve added. When I say “we” I mean my  brother and I. I have been teaching social studies for 19 years and my brother, Joe, is an historian. Between the 2 of us we create these reading passages. 

TO VIEW A DIRECTORY ALL OF THE U.S. HISTORY PASSAGES CLICK HERE.

Below is a picture of each page. Click on the link to download your PDF copy.

TINKER VS. DES MOINES

If you’re interested in some close read lesson ideas for teaching with this resource this article will help.

Students do not only study constitutional history, they are part of it.  Students, for instance, have free speech rights.  But, as any teacher will tell you, only so far.  A student protest during the Vietnam War led to a major Supreme Court decision.  


Student Rights


Some students, Jehovah Witnesses, believed that being required to pledge allegiance to the flag violated biblical requirements. They argued that being required to do so by public schools (or being expelled) was a violation of their First Amendment rights, particularly the right to exercise their religion.  The Supreme Court in the middle of WWII agreed with them, but rested on freedom of speech.  


Symbolic Speech


The Supreme Court agreed that public school students could not be forced to communicate their support of another belief. The Court said that public schools can teach patriotism, but not this way.  One important aspect of the opinion was the recognition that freedom of expression is not merely about words.  It is also about certain actions, like saluting a flag, and symbols.  Symbols, such as a wedding ring symbolizing the love of a married couple, are important means of expression.  


Vietnam


The 1960s is particularly remembered for people protesting a range of things they felt needed to change, including the need to bring an end to the Vietnam War.  Students, including those under eighteen, took part in these actions. 


For instance, in 1965, quoting the Supreme Court opinion in the case arising from their actions, three students in Des Moines, Iowa decided “to publicize their objections to the hostilities in Vietnam and their support for a truce by wearing black armbands during the holiday season and by fasting.”  Mary Beth Tinker (13), her brother John (15) and Christopher Eckhardt (16) were the students involved.  

But, their public schools opposed them wearing armbands to class, concerned that it would cause disruption.  The schools did allow students to wear political buttons and other symbols that caused some controversy.  The schools thus singled out a type of message, suggesting a bias against others. The students wore the armbands to school and were suspended for breaking the rules. 

Schoolhouse Gate


The students sued, arguing they had the freedom to promote their message, and that the school did not prove it was so disruptive as to warrant denying them the right to do so.  The Supreme Court agreed in a 1969 opinion, noting: “It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”   


The Supreme Court agreed that something, including symbolic speech, that could “substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate discipline in the operation of the school” could be banned.  But, that wasn’t shown here.  Merely causing some disagreement, especially if the school allows some points of view over others (such as political buttons), is not enough.  That is just part of free speech.  


Dissent 


Two justices disagreed, arguing that there was enough evidence that the armbands could cause problems that interfered with normal school activities.  Courts should not second guess the school’s judgment unless the schools were very unreasonable.


Over the years, schools and courts had to make various judgment calls, including involving such things as t-shirts with offensive messages or pro-marijuana banners at a school assembly.  Students have free speech rights, but there are limits. A student reading this is well aware of this, if not always happy about it.  

Teach and Thrive

A Bronx, NY veteran high school social studies teacher who has learned most of what she has learned through trial and error and error and error.... and wants to save others that pain.

Recent Posts